The AI-fy TRIAD addresses the three layers an assistant reads: whether it can reach you, whether it can parse you, and whether the wider web corroborates you. One method, measured against a baseline, from technical foundation to entity authority.
Scoped to outcomes, not hours.
They are not the same work, and progress in one does not transfer to the other. The comparison below is structural, not a ranking.
| LLMO with AI-fy | Traditional SEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Optimizes for | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity | Google and Bing results pages |
| Weights | Access, structure, corroboration | Keywords and backlinks |
| Output | Inclusion in one synthesized answer | A position on a page of links |
| Core metric | Share of answer, shortlist inclusion | Keyword rank, clicks |
| Signal timeline | Two to four weeks, technical layer | Three to six months |
Three layers, repaired in order, each with a metric that shows movement.
Crawler access for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and the rest. Server-side rendering so key content is visible. Organization and Person schema, an llms.txt file, a clean sitemap.
Priority pages rebuilt answer-first. Headings phrased as buying questions. Tables and lists structured to parse cleanly. The evidence density that earns a citation.
A verified entity web of consistent profiles, strengthened author signals, and corroborating mentions on the sources assistants cite, tracked as share of answer.
Each stage depends on the one before it. The trend is reported against the starting baseline throughout, so progress is always attributable.
Share of answer is measured across the four engines on your priority buying-intent prompts.
The technical and content layers are repaired so assistants can reach, read and parse the firm.
Entity authority is constructed and corroborating signals are placed on the sources AI trusts.
The firm is re-tested against the baseline, and the trend is reported until it is cited on priority prompts.
Each engagement is scoped to the value at stake and set with you in the conversation. The scopes differ in depth, not in method.
For a firm that needs to become readable and cited.
Adds the corroboration that earns the answer.
Holds the position as the engines change.
Most firms begin with a sprint and continue into the partnership as results compound.
A baseline is taken at the start and a re-benchmark at the end. Every report shows movement across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. The work is EU-based and worked to European data-governance standards, with the logic behind each change documented.
The technical layer is readable within the first weeks. A foundation engagement typically completes inside six weeks; an authority engagement runs to around ten and includes a re-test against the baseline. Ongoing governance then runs over twelve months.
Because hours measure input, not result. The clock would reward a slower consultant, while you are best served by a fast outcome. Engagements are scoped to the value at stake, so the incentive is the result rather than the duration.
Yes. Entity consistency across DACH, Benelux and the UK is part of the authority work. Inconsistent signals across languages split a firm's authority and read as uncertainty to an assistant. The aim is for the entity to read as one firm in every market.
Access to the site and a content owner, plus a single point of contact who can approve decisions within five working days so momentum holds. The method, analysis, implementation and reporting sit with AI-fy.me.
A thirty-minute conversation scopes the value before anything is built.
Book a strategy conversation© Copyright 2026. AI-fy.me. All rights reserved.